{"id":476,"date":"2020-08-26T22:49:32","date_gmt":"2020-08-26T19:49:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/demo\/?p=476"},"modified":"2026-08-27T10:20:32","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T07:20:32","slug":"synodikos-cazimi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/2020\/08\/26\/synodikos-cazimi\/","title":{"rendered":"SYNODIKOS (CAZIMI)"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

17 A\u011fustos 2020 tarihinde 18:06:53\u2019te yine bir G\u00fcne\u015f-Merk\u00fcr kavu\u015fumu ya\u015fand\u0131 ve bu da defalarca yaz\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 erteledi\u011fim “cazimi” hususunda bana tekrar bir f\u0131rsat sunmu\u015f oldu. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ben de bu yaz\u0131da, \u00f6zellikle Helenistik metinlerde ge\u00e7en ve cazimi kavram\u0131na kaynakl\u0131k etmi\u015f olan ilgin\u00e7 birka\u00e7 husustan s\u00f6z edecek ve \u00e7ok az da \u0131\u015f\u0131n alt\u0131nda kalma ve yanmaya de\u011finece\u011fim.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00c7ok genel olarak cazimi, bug\u00fcn al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z tan\u0131mlamayla \u201cG\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in kalbinde olmak\u201d demektir ve b\u00f6yle bir gezegen kral taraf\u0131ndan imtiyazl\u0131d\u0131r; dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu durum, \u201cyanma\u201d pozisyonunun oldu\u011fu bir b\u00f6lgede gezegene \u00f6zel bir kuvvet vermektedir, gezegen etkilidir ve baz\u0131 astrologlara g\u00f6re de iyi y\u00f6nlerini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n

G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczdeki tart\u0131\u015fmalar ise genel olarak cazimi pozisyonundaki bir gezegenin orb miktar\u0131, NASA\u2019n\u0131n verilerinin mi yoksa klasiklerin mi tercih edilip edilmemesi gerekti\u011fi, belirli bir tolerans de\u011feri dahilinde enlem \u015fart\u0131, her gezegenin cazimi olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi konular etraf\u0131nda d\u00f6n\u00fcyor. B\u00f6ylece \u00e7o\u011funlukla teknik detaylar hususunda birden fazla fikir var ve bunlar da biraz eksik biraz fazla bu gibi ba\u015fl\u0131klar alt\u0131nda toparlanabilir. Ne var ki ben, sadece teknik de\u011fil anlamsal olarak da farkl\u0131l\u0131klardan bahsetmek istiyorum. Konu hakk\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli desteklerde bulunan de\u011ferli \u00f6\u011frenci arkada\u015flar\u0131ma da te\u015fekk\u00fcr ediyorum.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

Resim: Gemini yapay zek\u00e2 ile \u00fcretildi.<\/p>\n

Tarihsel S\u00fcre\u00e7 ve Anlam<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Klasik astroloji gelene\u011finin \u00f6nemli yorumlama tekniklerinden birisi olan caziminin g\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki Helenistik astrolojik bir k\u00f6keni var. B\u00f6yle bir durum, klasik astroloji dedi\u011fimiz zaman art\u0131k \u201changi klasik?\u201d \u015feklinde bir soru sormam\u0131z gerekti\u011fine de i\u015faret ediyor; klasikler art\u0131k birbirleriyle \u00f6zellikle baz\u0131 hususlarda g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckle ba\u011fda\u015fabilen bamba\u015fka astrolojiler olarak yerlerini alm\u0131\u015f durumda. Genel bir izlenim olarak konu\u015fuyorum, bug\u00fcn otomatik bir \u015fekilde kabul etti\u011fimiz baz\u0131 bilgiler daha eskilerde \u00e7ok daha farkl\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor. Pek tabii ki sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7 \u00f6nceki s\u00fcreci iyile\u015ftirmi\u015f, geli\u015ftirmi\u015f olabilir ancak farkl\u0131 yorumlam\u0131\u015f da olabilir. Nihayetinde tarihsel anlamda zamanda \u00f6nde olmak daha do\u011fru olmak demek de\u011fildir; bu, pek\u00e2l\u00e2 ba\u015fka bir bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131yla yola devam edildi\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelebilir.<\/span><\/p>\n

Fakat genel itibariyle bu tart\u0131\u015fmalar pek tabii ki as\u0131ls\u0131z de\u011fildir ve ben de kadim bilgilerin daha \u00e7ok Antik D\u00f6nem taraf\u0131nda oldu\u011fumdan bu konuya b\u00f6yle bir a\u00e7\u0131dan yakla\u015fmak istiyorum, uygulamam da bu y\u00f6ndedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla konu g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczdeki cazimi kavram\u0131na nereden ve nas\u0131l evrildi, \u00f6ncelikle buna bir bakmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fal\u0131m\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

1. B\u00e2bil<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Asl\u0131nda caziminin ait oldu\u011fu aile, \u201cgezegenlerin sinodik d\u00f6ng\u00fcleri\u201d dedi\u011fimiz kavramd\u0131r ve bundan da yakla\u015f\u0131k olarak, bir gezegenin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le kavu\u015fumundan tekrar kavu\u015fumuna kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreci anl\u0131yoruz. \u201cSinodik\u201d dedi\u011fimiz kelime \u201cbulu\u015fma noktas\u0131\u201d demektir ve tam olarak bunu kasteder. Tabii ki t\u00fcm d\u00f6ng\u00fc gezegenlerin sadece G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le de\u011fil, birbirleriyle olan ve tekrar kavu\u015fumla biten s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini de kaps\u0131yor, ama bizi \u015fu anda ilgilendiren G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le al\u00e2kal\u0131 olan k\u0131s\u0131m. [1]<\/span><\/p>\n

Buradan hareketle caziminin \u00e7ok daha uzak ge\u00e7mi\u015finde B\u00e2bil olabilir, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu B\u00e2bil\u2019de A\u0161\u0161urbanipal k\u00fct\u00fcphanesinde bulunan ve ilkleri, I. B\u00e2bil Hanedanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan M\u00d6 1670 y\u0131llar\u0131na kadar giden bu \u00e7ivi yaz\u0131l\u0131 tabletlerin (Enuma Anu Enlil, k\u0131saca EAE) 63. tabletinde \u00f6zellikle Ven\u00fcs g\u00f6zlemleri vard\u0131r [2] ve bu g\u00f6zlemlerde Ven\u00fcs sabah (G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in do\u011fu\u015fundan \u00f6nce do\u011fuda g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr olmak) ve ak\u015fam y\u0131ld\u0131z\u0131 (G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in bat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan sonra bat\u0131da g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr olmak) olarak ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmektedir ki bu, Ven\u00fcs\u2019\u00fcn bat\u0131da ve do\u011fuda g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcyle ilgilidir, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla gezegenin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le kavu\u015fumundan bir sonraki kavu\u015fumuna kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre\u00e7 dikkatle incelenmi\u015ftir. Burada bir terim olarak cazimiden bahsedilmemektedir, buna dair bir iz yoktur fakat cazimi sonu\u00e7ta bir G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le kavu\u015fum fenomeni oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bu terimin o biny\u0131llara dayan\u0131yor olabilece\u011finden bahsedebiliriz \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Ven\u00fcs\u2019\u00fcn sinodik d\u00f6ng\u00fcleri bu tabletlerde vard\u0131r, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla en az\u0131ndan b\u00f6yle bir \u015fey d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmemiz olas\u0131l\u0131k dahilindedir. Ne var ki caziminin B\u00e2bil k\u00f6keniyle (ayr\u0131ca olas\u0131l\u0131kla M\u0131s\u0131r k\u00f6keniyle. Duat, G\u00fcne\u015f \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u00f6rt\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f gezegenlerin yeralt\u0131na ini\u015f s\u00fcreci \u015feklinde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir) ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 bir spek\u00fclasyondan \u00f6teye g\u00f6t\u00fcremiyorum, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu yaz\u0131lanlar\u0131 sadece \u201colabilir mi?\u201d \u015feklinde bir fikir olarak alg\u0131lay\u0131p b\u0131rakal\u0131m ve Helenistik D\u00f6neme ge\u00e7elim.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

2. Atinal\u0131 Antiochus (MS ge\u00e7 1. yy ile 2. yy\u2019\u0131n ortalar\u0131)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

B\u00e2bil k\u00f6keni hususundaki spek\u00fclasyonum bir yana, Helenistik D\u00f6nemde caziminin oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde do\u011frudan izlenimlere sahibiz. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ilk olarak, cazimiyi anlatan veya \u00f6nc\u00fcl olarak sonraki zamanlardaki olu\u015fumu ve evrilmesine kaynakl\u0131k eden Atinal\u0131 Antiochus\u2019u konuk etmek istiyorum.<\/span><\/p>\n

Asl\u0131nda bug\u00fcnk\u00fc tahminler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, Atinal\u0131 Antiochus\u2019un ya\u015fam y\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n bir ba\u015fka Helenistik d\u00f6nem astrolo\u011fu olan Serapion\u2019la neredeyse ayn\u0131 d\u00f6neme denk geldi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcl\u00fcyor. O y\u00fczden bu ikisi aras\u0131nda hangisinin daha \u00f6nce geldi\u011fini bilemiyoruz. Fakat Antiochus, alttaki al\u0131nt\u0131da da g\u00f6r\u00fclebilece\u011fi \u00fczere kendisinden \u00f6nce hi\u00e7bir astrologta bu bilginin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, onu kendisinin test ederek buldu\u011funu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Do\u011fru veya yanl\u0131\u015f bilinemez, fakat bu nedenle onu caziminin en eski versiyonunu aktaran yazar olarak ilk s\u0131raya yerle\u015ftirmek durumunda kal\u0131yorum. Bu arada bir\u00e7ok web sayfas\u0131nda cazimiye ili\u015fkin en eski bilginin M\u0131s\u0131rl\u0131 Rhetorius (MS 6. veya 7. yy) kaynakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenmektedir fakat Rhetorius, David Pingree\u2019ye ve Robert Hand\u2019a g\u00f6re [3] cazimiyi do\u011frudan Atinal\u0131 Antiochus\u2019tan al\u0131nt\u0131lam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Rhetorius\u2019u da kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 maksad\u0131yla dipnotta [4] veriyorum, her iki metin de neredeyse birebir ayn\u0131d\u0131r:<\/span><\/p>\n

Atinal\u0131 Antiochus:<\/strong> \u201cAnd we have said these things concerning the stars which rise in the morning or the evening. For, those of the stars which have come to be setting or retrograde are inactive and weaker and irregular in relation to what they do, except for those stars which are in the heart. And those stars are said to be in the heart which travel in company with the Sun, either on the same degree, or beside it. Non of the ancients was aware of this phase, but we record it after having tested it, since Ptolemy calls this phase \u201csynodic\u201d, though he has not spoken of its activity.\u201d [5]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cBu \u015feyleri y\u0131ld\u0131zlar\u0131n do\u011fusal veya bat\u0131sal do\u011fu\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda s\u00f6yledik \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc y\u0131ld\u0131zlar, kalpte olanlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, bat\u0131\u015fta veya geri harekettelerken aktif de\u011fillerdir, daha zay\u0131ft\u0131r ve yapt\u0131klar\u0131na istinaden (=etki olarak, \u00e7n) istikrars\u0131zd\u0131rlar. Ve kalpte olanlar da, ya ayn\u0131 ya da biti\u015fik derecede G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le birlikte hareket edenlerdir. Eskilerden hi\u00e7biri bu faz\u0131 bilmiyordu ancak biz bunu test etti\u011fimiz i\u00e7in kaydediyoruz \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Ptolemaios, tesirinden bahsetmemesine ra\u011fmen bu faz\u0131 \u201csinodik\u201d \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlad\u0131.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Ptolemaios ger\u00e7ekten de, Tetrabiblos\u2019un IV. kitab\u0131n\u0131n \u201cEvlili\u011fe Dair\u201d isimli V. ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda kavu\u015fuma (sinodik) ve G\u00fcne\u015f \u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 alt\u0131nda kalma durumuna de\u011finmekte, fakat burada Antiochus\u2019un da dedi\u011fi gibi cazimi anlam\u0131nda \u00f6zel bir pozisyondan konu\u015fmamaktad\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan caziminin kavu\u015fum orbu hakk\u0131nda da fikir sahibi oluyoruz; Holden\u2019in 2. dipnotuna g\u00f6re bu, 1 drc\u2019dir. [6]<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yorum<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Antiochus\u2019un c\u00fcmlelerinden \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar \u015fu \u015fekilde toparlanabilir:<\/span><\/p>\n

a) Synodikos \u201ckalpte olmak\u201d demektir ve bu durumda olan gezegenler aktif, g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ve etki anlam\u0131nda istikrarl\u0131d\u0131r, ama burada bir gezegenin iyicil olma, muhte\u015fem sonu\u00e7lara ula\u015fma vs. gibi olas\u0131 ba\u015fka sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilmemektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n

b) Bir gezegenin cazimi olabilmesi i\u00e7in, G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le aras\u0131ndaki mesafenin 1 drc\u2019yi ge\u00e7memesi gerekir ve gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 derecede olmak zorunda da de\u011fildir yani orb 1 drc\u2019dir. Ayn\u0131 zamanda enlem \u015fart\u0131ndan da bahsedilmemektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n

c) Yaz\u0131lanlara g\u00f6re bu pozisyon daha eskiler taraf\u0131ndan bilinmemektedir, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla cazimi derken asl\u0131nda tamamen s\u00f6zkonusu astrolo\u011fun kazand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir teknikten de konu\u015fuyor olabiliriz.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

3. \u0130skenderiyeli Serapion (M\u00d6 1. yy veya MS 1. yy)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u015eimdi, Antiochus\u2019un yorumundan daha farkl\u0131, en az\u0131ndan daha ilgin\u00e7 bir ba\u015fka Helenistik metine, Serapion\u2019a bakabiliriz: Serapion\u2019daki problem, ona atfedilen fragmanlarda ba\u015fka yazarlardan da bilgiler oldu\u011fudur fakat yine de alttaki al\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n, Serapion\u2019un kendisinden daha sonraki d\u00f6nemlerdeki ba\u015fka yazarlardan eklendiklerine ili\u015fkin bir bilgi bulunmuyor. O y\u00fczden s\u00f6zkonusu al\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131, Antiochus\u2019la birlikte yine cazimi kavram\u0131na ili\u015fkin en erken d\u00f6nem synodikos\/cazimi tan\u0131mlamalar\u0131 \u015feklinde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebiliriz:<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1.<\/strong> \u201cThe [stars] under the beams of the Sun are themselves weak: the Sun, taking hold of their strength, distribute their effects in appropriate times: the good ones to Venus and Jupiter, the bad ones to Mars and Saturn, particularly when they are in profitable signs. If they are synodic, in some way they gain strength due to their having their share of the light of the Sun, and they return their effects in later times, if they are in profitable signs. Mercury particularly rejoices being synodic and gets effectual.\u201d [7]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cG\u00fcne\u015f \u0131\u015f\u0131nlar\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki (y\u0131ld\u0131zlar\u0131n) kendileri zay\u0131ft\u0131r: Y\u0131ld\u0131zlar\u0131n (=gezegenlerin) g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc ele ge\u00e7iren G\u00fcne\u015f, uygun zamanlarda onlar\u0131n etkilerini; iyi olanlar\u0131nkini Ven\u00fcs ve J\u00fcpiter\u2019e, k\u00f6t\u00fc olanlar\u0131nkini ise Mars ve Sat\u00fcrn\u2019e \u2013\u00f6zellikle bunlar faydal\u0131 (uygun) bur\u00e7larda (veya, evlerde; ev=bur\u00e7) olduklar\u0131nda\u2013 iletir. Bu y\u0131ld\u0131zlar sinodik olduklar\u0131nda, G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan nasiplendikleri i\u00e7in bir \u015fekilde g\u00fc\u00e7 kazan\u0131rlar ve faydal\u0131 (uygun) bur\u00e7larda (veya: evlerde) olduklar\u0131 sonraki zamanlarda etkilerini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131rlar (bir nev\u00ee \u201chissedilir olur\u201d anlam\u0131nda). Bilhassa Merk\u00fcr sinodik olmay\u0131 sever (veya: olmaktan sevinir) ve etkili (efektif) olur.\u201d (T\u00fcrk\u00e7e \u00e7eviriye katk\u0131lar\u0131 i\u00e7in Hakan E. Kay\u0131o\u011flu, \u00d6. Demira\u011f ve Bar\u0131\u015f \u00d6zbayraktar\u2019a te\u015fekk\u00fcr ederim).<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 2.<\/strong> \u201cThe stars that happen to be on advantageous places of the birth, that is, when they are found upon pivots, on a phase, on Lots, and exactly on synodic conjunctions, are said to be dominating (\u1fbf\u03b9\u03c3\u03c7\u03cd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2).\u201d [8] (Buradaki \u201csynodic conjunctions\u201d ifadesi ille de G\u00fcne\u015f-planet kavu\u015fumuna i\u015faret etmek zorunda de\u011fil, gezegen-gezegen kavu\u015fumu da kastediliyor olabilir, ancak hangisinin kastedildi\u011fi belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yine de metni ekliyorum).<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cDo\u011fum an\u0131nda tesad\u00fcfen uygun\/avantajl\u0131\/faydal\u0131 ik\u00e2metlerde bulunan y\u0131ld\u0131zlardan i\u00e7in \u2013ki bunlar k\u00f6\u015felerde, fazlar\u0131nda, Arap noktalar\u0131yla birlikte ve ekzakt bir \u015fekilde sinodik kavu\u015fumda olmakt\u0131r\u2013 dominantt\u0131rlar denir (\u1fbf\u03b9\u03c3\u03c7\u03cd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1 ve 2\u2019de ge\u00e7en faydal\u0131\/uygun bur\u00e7lar\/evler, Serapion\u2019a g\u00f6re 4 k\u00f6\u015fe evi ile II-V-VIII-XI. evlerdir. [9]<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yorum<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

a. \u0130lk olarak Al\u0131nt\u0131 1\u2019e bakal\u0131m fakat metinde ge\u00e7en \u201cuygun zamanlarda\u201d ve \u201csonraki zamanlarda\u201d ifadeleri Serapion\u2019un yorumlanmas\u0131nda g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131yor: \u00d6ncelikle G\u00fcne\u015f, \u0131\u015f\u0131nlar\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki gezegenlerin g\u00fc\u00e7lerini ele ge\u00e7irmekte ve onlar\u0131 zay\u0131flatmaktad\u0131r. Fakat daha sonra \u201cuygun zamanlar\u201d gelmekte ve G\u00fcne\u015f bu uygun zamanlarda gezegenlerin g\u00fc\u00e7lerini onlara iletmekte, bir nev\u00ee geri vermektedir. Buradaki \u201cuygun zamanlar\u0131\u201d synodikos\/cazimi an\u0131, tam s\u0131f\u0131r orblu an olarak yorumluyorum.<\/span><\/p>\n

b. Ne var ki metnin geri kalan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n yorumunda i\u015fimiz zorla\u015f\u0131yor: Y\u0131ld\u0131zlar sinodik yani cazimi oluyor ve o anda g\u00fc\u00e7 kazan\u0131yorlar, ne var ki faydal\u0131 (uygun) bur\u00e7lara\/evlere ge\u00e7tikleri \u201csonraki zamanlarda\u201d etkileri a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor, hissedilir veya bir anlamda g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr oluyor. Fakat i\u015fte zaten tam olarak bu nokta problemli: E\u011fer gezegenler sinodik anda\/cazimi an\u0131nda g\u00fc\u00e7 kazan\u0131yorlarsa (ki bu, kabul edilecekse Al\u0131nt\u0131 2\u2019ye g\u00f6re de b\u00f6yledir; e\u011fer gezegenler ekzakt bir \u015fekilde sinodik kavu\u015fumda olurlarsa dominant olurlar), etkileri neden daha sonraki zamanlarda bulunacaklar\u0131 uygun\/faydal\u0131 evlere\/bur\u00e7lara girdiklerinde a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor? Zaten sinodik anda g\u00fc\u00e7 kazanmam\u0131\u015flar m\u0131yd\u0131?<\/span><\/p>\n

Bu soruyu yan\u0131tlayabilmek i\u00e7in birka\u00e7 yorum denenebilir:<\/span><\/p>\n

Versiyon 1:<\/strong> Bir gezegen cazimi an\u0131nda g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcd\u00fcr, fakat ya\u015fam\u0131n ilerleyen zamanlar\u0131nda bu gezegenler daha uygun evlere girdiklerinde etkilerini daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcr\u00fcz.<\/span><\/p>\n

Versiyon 2:<\/strong> Horary astroloji kastedilmi\u015ftir; sorunun soruldu\u011fu anda cazimi varsa gezegen g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcd\u00fcr, fakat ilerleyen zamanlarda uygun evlerde olduklar\u0131nda etkiler g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr olur, soruyla ilgili yan\u0131t al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n

Versiyon 3:<\/strong> Cazimi an\u0131nda gezegen ger\u00e7i dominantt\u0131r ve g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcd\u00fcr fakat bu g\u00fc\u00e7 hen\u00fcz potansiyel anlamdad\u0131r. Gezegen ne zaman ki uygun bur\u00e7lara\/evlere girer, o zaman bu potansiyel g\u00fc\u00e7 fonksiyonel g\u00fc\u00e7 h\u00e2lini al\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tam o s\u0131f\u0131r an\u0131n\u0131, ilerde fonksiyonel olacak potansiyel bir g\u00fc\u00e7 olarak g\u00f6rmeliyiz; bir kuvvet ger\u00e7i mevzu bahis olabilir ancak hen\u00fcz i\u015fler de\u011fildir. Ne zaman ki gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f \u0131\u015f\u0131nlar\u0131 alt\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kacak ve Serapion\u2019a g\u00f6re uygun\/faydal\u0131 ev veya bur\u00e7 anlam\u0131nda \u201cik\u00e2metlere\u201d girecek, o zaman potansiyelini, yani toplad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcc\u00fc fonksiyonel anlamda kullanabilecek.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSonraki zamanlarda\u201d gibi bir gelecek zaman ifadesiyle ili\u015fkili olarak akl\u0131ma gelenler bunlar ve bir anlamda do\u011fru olabilir fakat Serapion\u2019dan g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze sadece par\u00e7a par\u00e7a fragmanlar kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu ifadelerin kendi ana ba\u011flam\u0131 i\u00e7inde nas\u0131l yaz\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nlerinde arkalar\u0131nda nas\u0131l c\u00fcmleler oldu\u011funu bilmiyoruz, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yaln\u0131zca eldeki 2 paragraftan yorum yapmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yoruz.<\/span><\/p>\n

Antiochus, synodikos\/cazimiyi kendisinin buldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti ve onda bu t\u00fcr bir gelecek zamanl\u0131 bir ifade yok, sonraki yazarlarda da rastlanm\u0131yor. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Serapion ba\u015fka bir husustan, bir ek detaydan, bir ayr\u0131nt\u0131dan, bir il\u00e2ve tan\u0131mdan konu\u015fuyor olabilir. Ancak bu noktada yine de kesin olan \u015fey, potansiyel veya fonksiyonel bilinmez, synodikos an\u0131nda gezegenlerin g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ve dominant olduklar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n

b. Serapion\u2019da cazimi pozisyonuna ili\u015fkin bir orb miktar\u0131 verilmemektedir. Fakat Al\u0131nt\u0131 2\u2019de \u201cekzakt sinodik kavu\u015fum\u201d ve 1\u2019de de \u201csinodik olmak\u201d \u015feklinde ifadelere rastl\u0131yoruz ve bu da hem Antiochus\u2019a hem de di\u011fer ba\u015fka astrologlara g\u00f6re 1 drc \u015feklinde ge\u00e7mektedir ve bu nedenle de Serapion da kuvvetle muhtemel 1 drc\u2019yi kastetmektedir. \u201cSinodik kavu\u015fum\u201dla bir gezegenin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le kavu\u015fumuna de\u011finilir ve eski Yunanca “synodos” kelimesi de \u201cbir araya gelmek\u201d demektir.<\/span><\/p>\n

c. T\u00fcm gezegenler cazimi olabilir (en az\u0131ndan Ven\u00fcs, J\u00fcpiter, Mars, Sat\u00fcrn ve Merk\u00fcr ismen an\u0131l\u0131yor, G\u00fcne\u015f ise zaten cazimiye neden olan gezegen, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla burada tek eksik olan Ay\u2019d\u0131r. Fakat Al\u0131nt\u0131 2\u2019de ayr\u0131m yapmadan t\u00fcm y\u0131ld\u0131zlar kastedilmektedir, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Ay\u2019\u0131 da ekleyebiliriz) ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki enlem \u015fart\u0131 da aranmamaktad\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n

d. Caziminin veya sinodik kavu\u015fumun getirilerinin her zaman \u201ciyi\u201d olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anl\u0131yoruz ve bu \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli bir ayr\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc cazimide genel kabul, onun bir gezegene mesel\u00e2 \u015fans gibi pozitif bir \u00f6zellik verdi\u011fidir. Ne var ki metinde 2 malefik ile 2 benefi\u011fin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le tam s\u0131f\u0131r noktas\u0131nda kavu\u015fumu birbirinden farkl\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmektedir: Mars ve Sat\u00fcrn ile Ven\u00fcs ve J\u00fcpiter\u2019in G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le tam s\u0131f\u0131r an\u0131ndaki kavu\u015fumlar\u0131, g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin bir araya gelmesidir; k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcllerin k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcll\u00fckleri, iyicillerin ise iyicillikleri bir anlamda resetleniyor ve bu da tam kavu\u015fum esnas\u0131nda bir enerji toplanmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7\u0131yor ki k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcller k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcll\u00fcklerini ve iyiciller de iyicilliklerini tekrar ele ge\u00e7iriyorlar. \u00d6te yandan Merk\u00fcr\u2019\u00fcn durumu daha ba\u015fka g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor: Metne g\u00f6re \u00f6zellikle onun b\u00f6yle bir s\u00fcreci en co\u015fkun h\u00e2liyle ya\u015famas\u0131 yani sevinmesi, bana g\u00f6re onun G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019ten en az uzakla\u015fabilen gezegen olmas\u0131yla al\u00e2kal\u0131d\u0131r; Merk\u00fcr\u2019\u00fcn sinodik s\u00fcreci di\u011fer t\u00fcm\u00fcne oranla en k\u0131sa oran\u0131d\u0131r ve h\u0131z\u0131 bu kadar y\u00fcksek bir gezegenin de pek tabii ki s\u00fcrekli enerji yenilemesi, bir anlamda \u201ctank\u0131n\u0131 doldurmas\u0131\u201d gerekmektedir ve bu da ona, di\u011ferlerine oranla \u201cdaha fazla sevinmesi\u201d i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli bir gerek\u00e7e sunmaktad\u0131r, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Merk\u00fcr\u2019\u00fcn tank\u0131 di\u011fer t\u00fcm\u00fcnden \u00e7ok daha h\u0131zl\u0131 bo\u015falmaktad\u0131r. Merk\u00fcr \u015fu veya bu \u015fekilde, s\u00fcrekli beslenmeye muhta\u00e7 bir gezegendir ve Serapion\u2019a g\u00f6re her besleni\u015f onu di\u011ferlerinden daha mutlu etmektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

4. Porphyrios (MS 3. yy)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cFor the conjunction is lordly whenever it changes to be partile [conjunct] the Sun in the same sign, not being separated from it by more than 59 minutes.\u201d [10]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cGezegenler 59 dk\u2019dan daha fazla uzakla\u015fmamak kayd\u0131yla, G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 bur\u00e7ta olarak onunla kavu\u015fuma giderlerse, bu kavu\u015fum lordvar\u00eedir (y\u00fcce, kibirli, amirane, y\u00f6netsel).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yorum<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

a. Porphyrios\u2019a g\u00f6re synodikos pozisyonu G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 bur\u00e7ta partil kavu\u015fumda olmal\u0131d\u0131r ve orb miktar\u0131 da en fazla 1 drc\u2019dir. Ne var ki son derece kuvvetli olan partil a\u00e7\u0131larla, Porphyrios\u2019un metnine g\u00f6re partil kavu\u015fumla ilgili bir sorunumuz var ve bu sorun da, partil bir kavu\u015fumun en fazla 1 drc i\u00e7inde mi olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi yoksa ayn\u0131 derecede olmak kayd\u0131yla en fazla 1 drc mi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndedir. E\u011fer ayn\u0131 derece i\u00e7inde olmak kayd\u0131yla 1 drc\u2019ye kadar orb kullan\u0131lacaksa, o h\u00e2lde synodikos\/cazimi \u00e7ok s\u0131k rastlanmayan bir fenomen h\u00e2lini al\u0131r. Ancak \u00f6te yandan b\u00f6yle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fczde baz\u0131 teknik problemler i\u00e7inde kal\u0131yoruz: Mesel\u00e2 Merk\u00fcr 28 drc 59 dk pozisyonunda Bo\u011fa\u2019da olsun. E\u011fer G\u00fcne\u015f de 29 drc 00 dk Bo\u011fa\u2019da olursa, her ikisi de ayn\u0131 derece rakam\u0131 i\u00e7inde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u201cMerk\u00fcr cazimi de\u011fildir\u201d demek zorunda kalaca\u011f\u0131z ve bunun da ne \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde anlaml\u0131 oldu\u011fu, tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r bir durum arzedecek.<\/span><\/p>\n

b. Synodikos pozisyonunda olan bir gezegen amiranedir, h\u00fckmedici ve kibirlidir. Buradaki ifade de genel itibariyle bir \u201cg\u00fc\u00e7\u201d \u015feklinde yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ama herhangi \u201ciyi\u201d bir durumdan bahsedilmiyor.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

5. Paulus Alexandrinus (MS 4. yy)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1:<\/strong> “They become conjunct whenever they happen to be in the same degree as the Sun in the same sign, not being distant from it by more than approximately 59 minutes”. [11]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cGezegenler, G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 bur\u00e7ta ayn\u0131 derece i\u00e7erisinde bulunmak ko\u015fuluyla ondan yakla\u015f\u0131k en fazla 59 dk (=0 drc 59 dk 59 sn) uzakl\u0131kta olurlarsa kavu\u015fumdad\u0131rlar.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 2:<\/strong> Skyscript Forum\u2019dan \u201cMargherita\u201d isimli kullan\u0131c\u0131 ise kitab\u0131n \u0130talyanca versiyonundan \u015fu \u015fekilde bir \u00e7eviri yapm\u0131\u015f; \u0130talyancas\u0131nda \u201ckavu\u015fum\u201d ifadesi burada do\u011frudan \u201csinodik\u201d \u015feklinde ge\u00e7iyor:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThey are called synodical when they are in the same sign and degree of the Sun. What does he mean? Planets, when they are in the sign of the Sun are called synodical, especially when they are in the same degree of the Sun, in 59′ ” Olimpiodorus, c. 11 in Paulus Alexandrinus. (I took it from Italian version, but you should have an English one).<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cE\u011fer onlar (gezegenler), G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 bur\u00e7ta ve derecede iseler sinodik olarak adland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rlar. (Paulus) neyi kastediyor? Gezegenler, e\u011fer \u00f6zellikle 59 dk dahilinde G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 derecede olurlarsa, sinodik \u015feklinde isimlendirilirler.\u201d [12]<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yorum<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

a. \u0130lk s\u0131radaki terc\u00fcme olan Holden\u2019\u0131n \u00e7evirisinde \u0130talyancas\u0131na g\u00f6re farkl\u0131l\u0131k \u201ckavu\u015fum\u201d ve \u201csinodik\u201d kelimelerinde fakat bunlar ayn\u0131 anlamda kullan\u0131l\u0131yor. Ne var ki sinodik kavu\u015fumun yani caziminin gezegene \u00f6zel bir durum bah\u015fetti\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir ifade yok. Fakat en az\u0131ndan teknik olarak burada bir cazimi h\u00e2linden bahsedildi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphesiz.<\/span><\/p>\n

b. Paulus\u2019ta di\u011ferlerinden farkl\u0131 bir durumla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131yoruz; ba\u015fka yazarlarda ayn\u0131 bur\u00e7 ve ayn\u0131 derecede, ama 0 drc 59 dk dahilinde olmak gibi bir \u015fart yokken Paulus\u2019ta var. Peki ama bunu b\u00f6yle mi anlamal\u0131y\u0131z?<\/span><\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7as\u0131, e\u011fer bu \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa mevzu problemli bir h\u00e2l alacak ve yine ayn\u0131 sorunla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015faca\u011f\u0131z: E\u011fer mesel\u00e2 Merk\u00fcr 28 drc 59 dk Aslan\u2019da ve G\u00fcne\u015f de 29 drc 00 dk Aslan\u2019da ise, s\u0131rf Merk\u00fcr\u2019le G\u00fcne\u015f ayn\u0131 derecede de\u011fil diye synodikos pozisyonu olmuyor mu olacak? Buradan yola \u00e7\u0131karak, Paulus muhtemelen ayn\u0131 derece i\u00e7erisinde en fazla 0 drc 59 dk uzakl\u0131kta olma durumuna daha bir vurgu yapm\u0131\u015f olmal\u0131 diye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmeliyiz.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

6. Rhetorius (MS 6. veya 7. yy)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Bkz. \u201c2. Atinal\u0131 Antiochus\u201d veya dipnot 4.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7lar<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

1. Daha sonraki y\u00fczy\u0131llara cazimi olarak ge\u00e7en ve \u00f6zel bir duruma i\u015faret eden bu kavram\u0131n Antik D\u00f6nem kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 “synodikos” veya “egkardios”tur. [13] Bunu, hem tan\u0131mlardan hem de Rhetorius\u2019un aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131 Antiochus\u2019un do\u011frudan \u201ckalpte\u201d ifadesini kullanmas\u0131ndan anl\u0131yoruz.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Bir gezegenin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le enlem (deklinasyon) anlam\u0131nda belirli bir orbta bulunmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131 yoktur.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le bir gezegen aras\u0131nda synodikos durumunun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan orb 0 drc 59 dk 59 sn\u2019dir. Fakat MS 4. yy\u2019da ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f Paulus Alexandrinus, ek olarak G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le ayn\u0131 derecede olma \u015fart\u0131 arar. Ancak bu durumu belki de \u201cen cazimi\u201d \u015feklinde yorumlamal\u0131y\u0131z ki bu hususu yaz\u0131m \u00f6ncesi kendileriyle payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m de\u011ferli \u00f6\u011frenci arkada\u015flar\u0131m da yakla\u015f\u0131k olarak benzer g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirdiler.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. Synodikos pozisyonunda herhangi bir gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in bulundu\u011fu bur\u00e7ta olmal\u0131d\u0131r yoksa synodikos olmaz. Diyelim ki bir gezegen 29 drc 59 dk ile \u0130kizler\u2019de ve G\u00fcne\u015f de 0 drc Yenge\u00e7\u2019te olsun, aralar\u0131ndaki fark sadece 1 dk olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yine de synodikos olmaz, en az\u0131ndan metinlerde buna ili\u015fkin bir bilgi bulunmuyor. B\u00f6yle bir yakla\u015f\u0131m asl\u0131nda T\u00fcm bur\u00e7 ev sistemi mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan garip de\u011fildir \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu sistemde bur\u00e7lar ve evler birbirlerinden kes(k)in s\u0131n\u0131rlarla ayr\u0131l\u0131r. Bunu, \u00a0synodikosun ki\u015finin kendi evinde vuku bulmas\u0131, ama yan taraf\u0131n (biti\u015fik evlerin, bur\u00e7lar\u0131n), kom\u015fusunun veya bir farkl\u0131 ki\u015finin evi olmas\u0131 gibi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebiliriz.<\/span><\/p>\n

5. Synodikos, t\u00fcm gezegenlere sonraki d\u00f6nemlerde baz\u0131 yazarlarda ge\u00e7ti\u011fi gibi muhte\u015fem olma, iyi olma, g\u00fczel sonu\u00e7lar gibi anlamlar katmaz ancak aktiflik, etkinlik (efektivite), amiranelik, kibir ve g\u00fc\u00e7 katar. Ayr\u0131ca bu anda iyiciller iyi, k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcller k\u00f6t\u00fc yanlar\u0131na tekrar kavu\u015furlar. K\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcllerin k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcl, iyicillerin iyi \u00f6zelliklerini geri almas\u0131 bana g\u00f6re yanl\u0131\u015f bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce de\u011fil \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc sonu\u00e7ta gezegenler tam bu anda resetlenerek orijinal formatlar\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fcyorlar. Synodikos pozisyonunu tam anlayabilmek i\u00e7in ger\u00e7i s\u0131f\u0131r\u0131nc\u0131 derecesinde olan, fakat efektif bir evde ve kendi y\u00f6netti\u011fi bur\u00e7lardan birinde bulunan bir gezegenle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rabiliriz; gezegen evet, daha hen\u00fcz resetlenmi\u015ftir ve yeni(den) do\u011fmu\u015ftur ancak etkilidir.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ne var ki 1 metinde (Serapion) synodikos i\u00e7in, o anda de\u011fil ama sonraki zamanlarda gezegen uygun bur\u00e7lara\/evlere (4 k\u00f6\u015fe evi + 2, 5, 8, 11. evler) ge\u00e7ti\u011finde aktive olacak bir \u201cg\u00fc\u00e7\u201dten bahsediliyor. Serapion\u2019un fikri \u015fu \u015fekilde olu\u015fmu\u015f olabilir: Sinodik d\u00f6ng\u00fc asl\u0131nda bir tur ve o turun bulu\u015fma noktas\u0131 tam o s\u0131f\u0131r an\u0131. O y\u00fczden, yani sinodik bir hareket asl\u0131nda dinamik bir hareket oldu\u011fundan, yani gelecekle (ileri do\u011fru bir hareketle) ilgili oldu\u011fundan, bu a\u015famada asl\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca bir yenilenme olmal\u0131 ve o y\u00fczden de etkisini tabii ki gelecek zamanda g\u00f6stermeli. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ona g\u00f6re tam synodikos an\u0131n\u0131 \u201cilerde fonksiyonel olacak potansiyel g\u00fc\u00e7\u201d \u015feklinde yorumlamak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/span><\/p>\n

6. Serapion\u2019a g\u00f6re Synodikos\u2019a t\u00fcm gezegenler dahildir fakat Merk\u00fcr ekstra \u201csevinir\u201d. Bu kadar h\u0131zl\u0131 hareket eden bir gezegenin enerjisi s\u00fcrekli bo\u015falaca\u011f\u0131ndan, her bir resetlenme kendisine iyi gelmekte, onu mutlu etmektedir. Ancak e\u011fer synodikos mesel\u00e2 enerjileri t\u00fckenmi\u015f (\u201c\u00f6lm\u00fc\u015fler\u201d art\u0131k) \u00e7e\u015fitli uzay gemilerinin (=gezegenler) G\u00fcne\u015f gibi bir enerji kayna\u011f\u0131na var\u0131p tanklar\u0131n\u0131 doldurma anlar\u0131ysa, bu durumda sadece Merk\u00fcr de\u011fil her gezegen sevinecektir \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc hi\u00e7bir gemi uzayda yak\u0131ts\u0131z kalmay\u0131 arzu etmez. Bu uzay gemileri tanklar\u0131n\u0131 yak\u0131tla doldurduklar\u0131 i\u00e7in pek tabii ki g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc olurlar \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc art\u0131k gelecekleri en az\u0131ndan bir s\u00fcreli\u011fine garanti alt\u0131ndad\u0131r. Veya bu noktada do\u011frudan Serapion hakl\u0131d\u0131r; bir uzay gemisi tank\u0131n\u0131 doldurdu\u011fu an hen\u00fcz g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc veya aktif de\u011fildir, g\u00fcc\u00fc potansiyeldir ancak sonras\u0131nda bu g\u00fc\u00e7 fonksiyonel de olacakt\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n

7. Synodikos konusunu daha metafizik, mistik veya sembolik anlamda da de\u011ferlendirebiliriz: G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in \u00e7ekirdek s\u0131cakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funu biliyoruz. Bir gezegen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnelim; onun ilk yok olma s\u00fcreci G\u00fcne\u015f \u0131\u015f\u0131nlar\u0131 alt\u0131na girdi\u011fi an ve gezegen burada yava\u015f yava\u015f \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne do\u011fru hareket h\u00e2linde. Serapion\u2019un ifadeleriyle, zay\u0131fl\u0131yor ve G\u00fcne\u015f taraf\u0131ndan tesirine yani bir anlamda varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na el koyuluyor ve gezegenin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yitirmesi de ba\u015fl\u0131yor. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 olan \u201c\u0131\u015f\u0131n alt\u0131nda olma\u201d, Helenistik metinler baz al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bir gezegenin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019e 15 drc\u2019den daha az mesafede olmas\u0131yla start al\u0131yor. Aradaki mesafe 7 drc\u2019den daha az oldu\u011funda ise gezegen t\u00fcm\u00fcyle g\u00f6r\u00fcnmez olacak ve \u00f6l\u00fcme daha da yakla\u015facakt\u0131r ki buna \u201cyanma\u201d diyoruz. Bu a\u015famadan sonra ise o yak\u0131p kavuran s\u0131cakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n art\u0131k tam merkezindeyiz ve tam bu an synodikos\/cazimi \u015feklinde adland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yor ve gezegen \u00f6l\u00fcyor.<\/span><\/p>\n

Fakat tam bu \u00f6l\u00fcm an\u0131nda asl\u0131nda mevzu h\u00e2l\u00e2 kapanm\u0131\u015f de\u011fil \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc gezegen turuna yeniden ba\u015flayacak, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla buras\u0131 bir temizlenme, ar\u0131nma ve yeniden do\u011fumun da an\u0131. Bu nedenle gezegen ger\u00e7i \u00f6l\u00fcyor, fakat e\u015f zamanl\u0131 yeniden do\u011fumu nedeniyle g\u00fc\u00e7 de kazan\u0131yor \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc her \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc bir yeni do\u011fum izler. B\u00f6yle bir d\u00f6ng\u00fcy\u00fc holistik, ba\u015f\u0131 sonu olmayan veya birbiriyle i\u00e7 i\u00e7e ge\u00e7mi\u015f bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 olarak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmeliyiz.<\/span><\/p>\n

B\u00f6ylece synodikos an\u0131 ruhsal ar\u0131nma ve temizlenme olarak rahat bir \u015fekilde kullan\u0131labilir, yeni ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirilebilir. Neredeyse kadim t\u00fcm k\u00fclt\u00fcrlerin geleneklerinde yeniden do\u011fu\u015f rit\u00fcelleri t\u00fcm\u00fcyle ate\u015fle ilgilidir (hatta Maternus, D\u00fcnya\u2019n\u0131n yenilenmesinin ate\u015f ve su ile gelece\u011fini s\u00f6yler), Anka ku\u015fu k\u00fcllerinden yeniden do\u011far ve bu anlamlarda bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, synodikos an\u0131n\u0131n kendisi sayesinde olu\u015ftu\u011fu G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019ten daha ate\u015f bir \u015fey olamaz.<\/span><\/p>\n

De\u011ferli arkada\u015f\u0131m Hakan E. Kay\u0131o\u011flu ile, bu metin haz\u0131rlan\u0131rken konuya istinaden (bir gezegenin nas\u0131l olup da \u201cen yanma\u201d h\u00e2linde yanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusu), \u00f6zellikle Serapion \u00fczerinden baz\u0131 konu\u015fmalar yapt\u0131k. S\u00f6ylediklerini \u015fu anki mevzumuza ba\u011flamak istiyorum: \u201cBu bak\u0131\u015f (astrolojinin kadim kaynaklar\u0131n\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 pagan bir bak\u0131\u015f) G\u00fcne\u015f’e tanr\u0131sall\u0131k ve di\u011fer her \u015feye hayat bah\u015feden bir g\u00fc\u00e7 atfediyor. Onlar\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00fcnden bakmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rsak, cazimi olgusu yarat\u0131c\u0131 enerjinin tam merkezinde yer alarak, bir nev\u00ee tanr\u0131sal tekilli\u011fin i\u00e7inde fan\u00ee olmay\u0131 ve nefsini (varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131) o y\u00fcce g\u00fcc\u00fcn varl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hi\u00e7leyerek g\u00fcc\u00fcn ve hayat\u0131n bizatihi kayna\u011f\u0131 olmay\u0131 da anlat\u0131yor olabilir. Tasavvufta ve suf\u00ee \u00f6\u011fretide fenafillah (=g\u00f6receli varl\u0131k bilincinin mutlak varl\u0131kta kaybolmas\u0131) ve sonras\u0131nda da bekabillah bilinci (=tanr\u0131sal bilin\u00e7le birle\u015fip sonsuz bir dirilik kazanmak) ile ya\u015fam\u0131na devam etmesi konular\u0131 vard\u0131r. G\u00fcne\u015f’in kalbinde olmak belki de bu t\u00fcr mistik bir ak\u0131lla\/bak\u0131\u015fla farkl\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131dan da incelenebilir.\u201d Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde Yonca da caziminin anlam\u0131n\u0131n \u201c\u00e7iftken bir olmak, cezm etmek\u201d oldu\u011funu aktar\u0131yor. [14] Ve bu da bir anlamda b\u00fct\u00fcnle\u015fme ile, Bir olma ile ilgilidir. Synodikos, yanman\u0131n hemen ard\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi i\u00e7in, onu bir nev\u00ee \u00e7\u00f6l\u00fcn ortas\u0131ndaki vaha, bir g\u00fc\u00e7 toplama merkezi \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr; \u00f6l\u00fcm ve yeniden do\u011fum ayn\u0131 anda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu anlarda yap\u0131lacak ki\u015fisel geli\u015fim aktiviteleri, enerji \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, dua gibi eylemlerde bulunmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr, \u00f6zellikle Bir ve B\u00fct\u00fcn olana dahil olmakla, onunla \u201cayn\u0131 kalpte\u201d yer almakla al\u00e2kal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n

8. Yanma ve I\u015f\u0131n Alt\u0131nda Kalma: Konumuzla do\u011frudan ilgisi olmasa da bunlara ili\u015fkin benim de kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131m Antik D\u00f6nem orblar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir: I\u015f\u0131n alt\u0131nda kalma 15 drc ve yanma 7 drc. Bu bilgiler bir\u00e7ok Antik yazarda bulunabilir.<\/span><\/p>\n

9. Daha sonraki zamanlarda synodikos\/caziminin orbu 0 drc 16-17 dk\u2019ya evrildi ve bu miktar da G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in diskinin yar\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r. Fakat her k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc kendi ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirmek zorunday\u0131z. Yar\u0131n ba\u015fka \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm aletleriyle orbu pek\u00e2l\u00e2 0 drc 1 dk olarak da belirleyebiliriz, o zaman ne olacak?<\/span><\/p>\n

Buradaki ana mevzu G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in kalbinde olma durumunun ne \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r; 1 drc\u2019lik bir orbla gezegeni G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019e daha h\u00e2l\u00e2 \u00e7ok yak\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz, gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in etraf\u0131ndan yeteri kadar ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f de\u011fildir. E\u011fer tam olarak bir astroloji-astronomi birlikteli\u011finden bahsedilecekse, 0 drc 16 veya 17 dk i\u00e7inde olmak yetmeyecek, t\u00fcm\u00fcyle enlem ve boylam birliktelikleri de aranacakt\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan, belki de 0 drc 16 veya 17 dk’l\u0131k bir orb “en cazimi” \u015feklinde de d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Helenistik D\u00f6nem Sonras\u0131 Metinler<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

En az\u0131ndan metinler dahilinde konu\u015fursak, yakla\u015f\u0131k olarak Rhetorius\u2019tan itibaren t\u00fcm d\u00fcnyalar de\u011fi\u015fmeye ve synodikos terimi de cazimi ismine evrilerek bug\u00fcn bilinen \u015feklini almaya ba\u015flad\u0131 fakat baz\u0131 istisnalar da yok de\u011fildir. Buradan itibarenki k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 da ekliyorum:<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

1. Sahl ibn Bishr al-Israili ( MS yak. 786 \u2013 yak. 845)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Sahl, bir planetin hangi durumlarda g\u00fc\u00e7 kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131ralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmde \u015funu yaz\u0131yor:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe tenth is if the planets are in the heart of the Sun, meaning when they are within one degree of it.\u201d [15]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi:<\/em> \u201cOnuncusu (onuncu g\u00fc\u00e7 kazanma h\u00e2li, \u00e7n), bir planetin G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019ten uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 1 drc dahilinde olmas\u0131 yani G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in kalbinde bulunmas\u0131 durumudur.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

2. Eb\u00fb Ma\u2019shar (MS 787-886)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1.<\/strong> (B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4, ba\u015fl\u0131k 30) \u201c2 – The good fortune of the planets is if they are in an aspect of the benefics – either sextile or trine – or they are in conjunction with them, or the malefics are cadent from them, or they are separating from a benefic and applying to another benefic, or they are contained between two benefics, or in the heart, or an aspect of the moon while the moon is made fortunate…\u201d [16]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi <\/em>(K\u0131sm\u00ee \u00e7eviri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r): \u201cPlanetlerin iyi t\u00e2lihleri [\u2026] veya kalpte (cazimi, \u00e7n) olurlarsa [\u2026] (ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir).\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 2.<\/strong> (B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4, ba\u015fl\u0131k 33) \u201c15 – the misfortune of the planets is if they are in conjunction with the malefics or in their opposition….Or they are in the conjunction with the sun or in quartile aspect or in opposition…\u201d [17]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em> (K\u0131sm\u00ee \u00e7eviri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r): \u201cPlanetlerin k\u00f6t\u00fc t\u00e2lihleri [\u2026] veya G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le kavu\u015fumda olurlarsa [\u2026] (ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

3. Demophilus (MS 10. yy)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhen planets are in the heart of the Sun, degree by degree, benefic planets see lasting their good, malefics their evil (in CCAG 5).\u201d [18]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi:<\/em> \u201cE\u011fer planetler derecesi derecesine (ayn\u0131 derecede, \u00e7n) G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in kalbindelerse benefiklerin iyicillikleri, malefiklerin de k\u00f6t\u00fcc\u00fcll\u00fckleri daimi olur.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

4. Abraham Ibn-Ezra (MS 1089-1164)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1.<\/strong> \u201cBirincisi, bir gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f ile ayn\u0131 derece ve ayn\u0131 dakikada yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, e\u011fer aralar\u0131ndaki mesafe 17 dakikadan daha azsa bu gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f ile kavu\u015fum yapar \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc e\u011fer bundan \u00e7oksa buna yan\u0131k [denir]; fakat kavu\u015fum s\u00f6zkonusu oldu\u011funda [i\u015faret etti\u011fi] her \u015feyin iyi gidece\u011fini g\u00f6sterir.\u201d [19]<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 2.<\/strong> \u201c 98) G\u00fcne\u015f ile temasta olan bir gezegen, kralla ayn\u0131 koltukta oturan birine benzer.\u201d [20]<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

5. Guido Bonatus (MS 13. yy)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1.<\/strong> \u201cAnd when the planet is with the Sun in one degree, so that there are 16\u2019 or less between them, both by latitude and longitude (which rarely happens), it is said to be united, and then it is made strong, because it is said to be in the Sun\u2019s forge, that is, in his heart.\u201d [21]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cE\u011fer gezegen, G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le 16 dk veya daha az miktarda olmak suretiyle G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le 1 drc i\u00e7erisinde birlikteyse ve hem enlem hem de boylam derecesi de 16 dk veya daha az miktardaysa (ki nadiren g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr), o zaman planet (G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le) birle\u015fmi\u015f olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131r ve bu pozisyon onu g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc yapar, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc gezegen G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in demirci oca\u011f\u0131nda, yani kalbindedir denir.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 2.<\/strong> \u201cIndeed I am in agreement with them, but not purely and simply. Because if a planet is distant from the Sun by less than 16\u2019 in longitude, and according to latitude it is distant by more than 16\u2019, nevertheless it is combust, because the distinction between combustion in latitude and combustion in longitude is practically imperceptible.\u201d [22]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi:<\/em> \u201cOnlar\u0131 ger\u00e7i onayl\u0131yorum, ancak kolayca ve kendili\u011finden de\u011fil: E\u011fer bir planetle G\u00fcne\u015f aras\u0131nda 16 dk\u2019dan daha az bir boylam fark\u0131 varsa ve 16 dk\u2019dan daha fazla bir enlem fark\u0131 varsa buna ra\u011fmen yan\u0131kt\u0131r, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc enlem olarak yanma ile boylam olarak yanma aras\u0131nda bir farkl\u0131l\u0131k kabul edilebilir de\u011fildir.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 3.<\/strong> \u201c[\u2026] in nativities or questions, whether the Sun and Moon are joined in one and the same minute according to longitude and according to latitude, and one of the benefics is in the Ascendant [\u2026] it signifies that the native or querent will be fortunate [\u2026]\u201d [23]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cNativelerde (do\u011fum haritas\u0131 sahibi, \u00e7n) veya soru haritalar\u0131nda, G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in ve Ay\u2019\u0131n enlem ve boylamda bir ve ayn\u0131 derecede birbirleriyle birle\u015fip birle\u015fmedikleri ve iyicillerden birinin ASC\u2019de olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, [\u2026] ki\u015finin veya soruyu soran\u0131n \u015fansa sahip olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Bu al\u0131nt\u0131daki k\u0131staslara g\u00f6re olu\u015fan bir G\u00fcne\u015f-Ay kavu\u015fumu \u00e7ok nadiren g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

6. William Lilly (MS 1602-1681)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 1.<\/strong> \u201cCazimi oder das Herz der Sonne: Ein Planet steht im Herzen der Sonne oder cazimi, wenn er nicht mehr als 17 min vorwaerts oder r\u00fcckwaerts von ihr entfernt ist; z. B. die Sonne steht auf 15.30 im Stier und Merkur auf 15.25 Stier. Hier ist Merkur in cazimi. Alle Autoren halten Planeten in cazimi f\u00fcr gestaerkt.\u201d [24]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cCazimi veya G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in Kalbi: E\u011fer bir planet G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019ten, \u00f6nce veya sonra 17 dk\u2019dan daha fazla uzakl\u0131kta de\u011filse G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in kalbinde veya cazimidir, mesel\u00e2 G\u00fcne\u015f 15 drc 30 dk Bo\u011fa\u2019da ve Merk\u00fcr 15 drc 25 dk Bo\u011fa\u2019da. Burada Merk\u00fcr cazimidedir. T\u00fcm yazarlar cazimideki bir planeti g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcrler.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Al\u0131nt\u0131 2.<\/strong> \u201cSteht ein Planet innerhalb von 16 Minuten von der Sonne, sagt man, er ist in cazimi oder in der Sonne Hitze. Dann ergibt dies ein zusaetzliches Gl\u00fcck und er ist bewundernswert stark.\u201d [25]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi<\/em>: \u201cE\u011fer bir planet G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019ten 16 dk dahilinde uzaksa cazimidedir veya G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019in \u015fiddetli s\u0131cakl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndad\u0131r denir. Bu durum (gezegene) ek bir \u015fans getirir ve o, takdire \u015fayan bir g\u00fc\u00e7tedir.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Dipnotlar\/Kaynaklar<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

[1]: https:\/\/www.lunarplanner.com\/HCpages\/SynodicCycle.html ve https:\/\/www.starzology.com\/synodic_cycles\/#:~:text=Synodic%20cycles%20refer%20to%20the,can%20unfold%20during%20the%20phase., 06.05.2020<\/span><\/p>\n

[2]: https:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Enuma_Anu_Enlil ve https:\/\/leibnizsozietaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/03-Filling.pdf , S. 27, 06.05.2020<\/span><\/p>\n

[3]: Rhetorius the Egyptian, Astrological Compendium, \u00e7ev. James Herschel Holden, American Federation of Astrologers, Tempe, Arizona, 2009, S. xix ve Antiochus of Athens, The Thesaurus, \u00e7ev. Robert Schmidt, Volume II-B, Berkeley Springs, 1993, S. viii, dipnot 3 (Robert Hand).<\/span><\/p>\n

[4]: M\u0131s\u0131rl\u0131 Rhetorius: \u201c[\u2026] And we have said these things about the morning and evening risings of the stars, for the settings and retrogrades of the stars are inactive and weaker and uneven in their action, except the stars that are in the heart. And the stars that are in the heart are said to be those that are conjoined partilely to the Sun, either in the same degree or an adjacent degree. None of the ancients have made mention of this phase, but, since we have found [it] by experiment, we have added it to the list, because even Ptolemy spoke of conjunction as a phase bu didn\u2019t mention its force.\u201d [Rhetorius the Egyptian, Astrological Compendium, \u00e7ev. James Herschel Holden, American Federation of Astrologers, Tempe, Arizona, 2009, S. 4]<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi: \u201cBu \u015feyleri y\u0131ld\u0131zlar\u0131n do\u011fusal ve bat\u0131sal do\u011fu\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda s\u00f6yledik \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc y\u0131ld\u0131zlar, kalpte olanlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, bat\u0131\u015fta ve geri harekettelerken aktif de\u011fillerdir, zay\u0131ft\u0131r ve etkilerinde istikrars\u0131zd\u0131rlar. Ve kalpte olanlar da, ya ayn\u0131 ya da biti\u015fik derecede G\u00fcne\u015f\u2019le k\u0131smen ba\u011flant\u0131da olanlard\u0131r. Eskilerden hi\u00e7biri bu fazdan konu\u015fmad\u0131 ancak biz bunu test etti\u011fimiz i\u00e7in listeye ekledik; Ptolemaios\u2019un kendisi dahi bir faz olarak kavu\u015fumdan bahsetmesine ra\u011fmen bu hususta bir g\u00fcce de\u011finmedi.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

[5]: Antiochus of Athens, The Thesaurus, \u00e7ev. Robert Schmidt, Volume II-B, Berkeley Springs, 1993, S. 4-5<\/span><\/p>\n

[6]: Rhetorius the Egyptian, Astrological Compendium, \u00e7ev. James Herschel Holden, Tempe\/AZ, 2009, S. 4, dipnot 3 ve 4, Ptolemaios\u2019taki ili\u015fkili yer i\u00e7in de bkz.: https:\/\/penelope.uchicago.edu\/Thayer\/E\/Roman\/Texts\/Ptolemy\/Tetrabiblos\/4B*.html#ref31, 19.08.2020<\/span><\/p>\n

[7]: https:\/\/www.hellenisticastrology.com\/translations\/serapion-definitions.pdf, S. 8<\/span><\/p>\n

[8]: [7] ile ak, S. 2<\/span><\/p>\n

[9]: [7] ile ak, S. 1<\/span><\/p>\n

[10]: Porhyry the Phlosopher, Introduction to the Tetrabiblos and Serapio of Alexandria, Astrological Definitions, James Herschel Holden, Tempe\/AZ, 2009, S. 6<\/span><\/p>\n

[11]: Paul of Alexandria, Introduction to Astrology, \u00e7ev. James Herschel Holden, Tempe\/AZ, 2012, S. 22-23. Ayr\u0131ca bu kitab\u0131n daha eski bir bask\u0131s\u0131nda Robert Schmidt de ayn\u0131 \u00e7eviriyi yap\u0131yor: Paulus Alexandrinus, Introductory Matters, \u00e7ev. Robert Schmidt, Berkeley Springs, WV, 1995, S. 28<\/span><\/p>\n

[12]: http:\/\/skyscript.co.uk\/forums\/viewtopic.php?t=4348, 06.05.2020<\/span><\/p>\n

[13]: https:\/\/www.astro.com\/astrology\/ivccn_article180927_e.htm?&lang=g, 26.08.2020<\/span><\/p>\n

[14]: http:\/\/www.astroyonca.com\/index.php\/2018\/10\/04\/cazimi-nedir-kazimi-degil-cazimi\/, 26.08.2020<\/span><\/p>\n

[15]: 5. dipnot: https:\/\/www.astro.com\/astrology\/ivccn_article180927_e.htm?&lang=g, 25.08.2020. Dipnotta kaynak\u00e7as\u0131 verilen eser: Sahl bin Bishr, Introductorium de principii iudiciorum Zahelis Ysmaelitae, in Works of Sahl and Masha\u2019allah, translated & ed. by Benjamin N. Dykes, Cazimi Press, Golden Valley 2008, p. 41.<\/span><\/p>\n

[16]: http:\/\/skyscript.co.uk\/forums\/viewtopic.php?t=4348, 25.08.2020 (Yuzuru isimli kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131). Payla\u015f\u0131mda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en eser: Abbreviation of the Introduction to Astrology, (edit. ve \u00e7ev.) Charles Burnett, Tempe\/AZ, 1997, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4, Ba\u015fl\u0131k 30<\/span><\/p>\n

[17]: [16] ile ak, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4, Ba\u015fl\u0131k 33<\/span><\/p>\n

[18]: http:\/\/skyscript.co.uk\/forums\/viewtopic.php?t=4348&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0, 25.08.2020, (Margherita isimli kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131).<\/span><\/p>\n

[19]: Avraham Ibn-Ezra, Bilgeli\u011fin Ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131, (\u00e7ev.) Sibel Oltulu, Eyl\u00fcl 2018, \u0130stanbul, S. 108<\/span><\/p>\n

[20]: [19] ile ak, S. 127<\/span><\/p>\n

[21]: https:\/\/www.astro.com\/astrology\/ivccn_article180927_e.htm?&lang=g, 25.08.2020, 6. dipnot. Dipnotta kaynak\u00e7as\u0131 verilen eser: Guido Bonatti, Book of Astronomy, translated by B. Dykes, Cazimi Press, Golden Valley, MN 2007, p.\u00a0 211<\/span><\/p>\n

[22]: [21] ile ak (p.\u00a0 211), dipnot 8<\/span><\/p>\n

[23]: [21] ile ak (p.\u00a0 325), dipnot 9<\/span><\/p>\n

[24]: William Lilly, Christliche Astrologie, Buch 1 und Buch 2, T\u00fcbingen 2007, S. 141<\/span><\/p>\n

[25]: [24] ile ak, S. 333<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

17 A\u011fustos 2020 tarihinde 18:06:53\u2019te yine bir G\u00fcne\u015f-Merk\u00fcr kavu\u015fumu ya\u015fand\u0131 ve bu da defalarca yaz\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 erteledi\u011fim “cazimi” hususunda bana tekrar bir f\u0131rsat sunmu\u015f oldu. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1870,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-genel"],"rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-scaled.jpg",2560,1396,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-scaled.jpg",2560,1396,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-scaled.jpg",2560,1396,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-300x164.jpg",300,164,true],"large":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-1024x559.jpg",1024,559,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-1536x838.jpg",1536,838,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-2048x1117.jpg",2048,1117,true],"post-thumbnail":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-550x300.jpg",550,300,true],"bravada-featured":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-752x300.jpg",752,300,true],"bravada-featured-lp":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-800x300.jpg",800,300,true],"bravada-featured-half":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-800x300.jpg",800,300,true],"bravada-featured-third":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-512x300.jpg",512,300,true],"bravada-lpbox-1":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-400x250.jpg",400,250,true],"bravada-lpbox-2":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-533x300.jpg",533,300,true],"woocommerce_thumbnail":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-300x300.jpg",300,300,true],"woocommerce_single":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-600x327.jpg",600,327,true],"woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-100x100.jpg",100,100,true],"sow-carousel-default":["https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Sino-272x182.jpg",272,182,true]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"Devrim Yilmazer","author_link":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/author\/devrim-yilmazer\/"},"rttpg_comment":1,"rttpg_category":"Blog<\/a> Genel<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"17 A\u011fustos 2020 tarihinde 18:06:53\u2019te yine bir G\u00fcne\u015f-Merk\u00fcr kavu\u015fumu ya\u015fand\u0131 ve bu da defalarca yaz\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 erteledi\u011fim “cazimi” hususunda bana tekrar bir f\u0131rsat sunmu\u015f oldu. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla …","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=476"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1902,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476\/revisions\/1902"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/galaktikastroloji.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}